问答题Many countries have, or are in the process of creating, their own "Silicon Valley". So far, none has as yet threatened the preeminence of the US prototype. What makes Silicon Valley such a unique entity? There are several crucial factors.First and fore

题目
问答题
Many countries have, or are in the process of creating, their own "Silicon Valley". So far, none has as yet threatened the preeminence of the US prototype. What makes Silicon Valley such a unique entity? There are several crucial factors.First and foremost, it has the largest concentration of brilliant computer professionals and the best supporting services in the world, and easy access to world-class research institutions, like Stanford University, which continually nurtures would-be geniuses which the industry needs in order to move forward. Without these advantages, the Valley would be a different place.Secondly, it actively encourages, or even exalts, risk-taking. Hence, failure holds no terror and there is no stigma attached to a failed effort. On the contrary, they will try even harder next time round. Such never-say-die approach is the sine qua non for the ultimate triumph in entrepreneurship and technological breakthrough.A third decisive factor is the vital role of venture capitalists who willingly support promising start-ups with urgently needed initial capital to get them started. Some would even give failed entrepreneurs a second chance if convinced that a fresh concept might lead to eventual success.
如果没有搜索结果或未解决您的问题,请直接 联系老师 获取答案。
相似问题和答案

第1题:

请阅读Passage 1。完成第小题。
Passage 1
African elephants have been slaughtered at alarming rate over the past decade, largely because they are the primary source of the world's ivory. Their population has been dwindled from 1.3 million in 1979 to just 625,000 today, and the rate of killing has been accelerating in recent years because many of the older, bigger tusked animals have already been destroyed. "The poachers now must kill times as many elephants to get the same quantity of ivory," explained Curtis Bohlen,Senior vice president of the World Wildlife Fund.
Though its record on the environment has been spotty so far, the government last week took the lead in a major conservation issue by imposing a ban on ivory imports into the US. The move came just four days after a consortium of conservation groups, including the World Wildlife Fund and Wildlife Conservation International, called for that kind of action, and it made the US the first nation to forbid imports of both raw and finished ivory. The ban, says Bohlen, sends a very clear message to the ivory poachers that the game is over.
In the past African nations have resisted an ivory ban, but increasingly they realized that the decimation of the elephant herds poses a serious threat to their tourist business. Last month Tanzania and several other African countries called for an amendment to the 102 nation Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species that would make the ivory trade illegal worldwide.
The amendment is expected to be approved at an October meeting in Geneva and to go into effect next January. But between now and then, conservationists contend, poachers may go on a rampage,killing elephants wholesale, so nations should unilaterally forbid imports right away. The US government brought that argument, and by week's end the twelve nations European Community had followed with its own ban.

Since many of the older, bigger-tusked animals have already been destroyed, what did the poacher do?
查看材料

A.They gave up poaching.
B.They killed more elephants to get the same quantity of ivory..
C.To them, game is over.
D.They realized it was illegal to slaughter elephants.

答案:B
解析:
文中第一段提到“The poachers now must kill times as many elephants to get the same quan-tity ofivory”.由此可知.偷猎者现在必须捕杀更多的大象以得到相同量的象牙。故选B。

第2题:

共用题干
第一篇

Human Evolution

Being a man has always been dangerous.There are about 105 males born for every 100 females, but this ratio drops to near balance at the age of maturity,and among 70-year-old there are twice as many women as men. But the great universal of male mortality is being changed.Now,boy babies survive almost as well as girls do. This means that,for the first time,there will be an excess of boys in those crucial years when they are searching for a mate. More important,another chance for natural selection has been removed. Fifty years ago,the chance of a baby(particularly a boy baby)surviving depended on its weight. A kilogram too light or too heavy meant almost certain death.Today it makes almost no difference.Since much of the variation is due to genes,one more agent of evolution has gone.
There is another way to commit evolutionary suicide:stay alive,but have fewer children.Few people are as fertile as in the past. Except in some religious communities,very few women have 15 children.Nowadays the number of births,like the age of death,has become average.Most of us have roughly the same number of offspring. Again,differences between people and the opportunity for natural selection to take advantage of it have diminished.India shows what is happening. The country offers wealth for a few in the great cities and poverty for the remaining tribal peoples.The grand mediocrity of today一everyone being the same in survival and number of offspring means that natural selection has lost 80%of its power in upper-middle一class India compared to the tribes.
For us,this means that evolution is over;the biological Utopia has arrived.Strangely,it has involved little physical change.No other species fills so many places in nature.But in the past 100,000 years一even the past 100 years一our lives have been transformed but our bodies have not. We did not evolve,because machines and society did it for us.Darwin had a phrase to describe those ignorant of evolution:"they look at an organic being as savage looks at a ship,as at something wholly beyond his comprehension."No doubt we will remember a 20th century way of life beyond comprehension for its ugliness. But however amazed our descendants may be at how far from Utopia we were,they will look just like us.

What does the last sentence mean?
A:It means that we are still very far from Utopia.
B:It means that our descendants look like us because of little biological change.
C:It means that our descendants will not reach Utopia either.
D:None of the above.

答案:B
解析:
文中第一段提到“做男人从来都充满危险,新生儿男女比例大约是105: 100,但到了成年,这一比例基本持平,而在70岁的老年人中,女性是男性的两倍。但是男性死亡率高这种普遍情况正在改变,现在男婴存活率同女婴的基本一样高”,这说明男人的存活率相对是比较低的。
使用事例来证明是常见的逻辑思维模式。既然有事例,我们就需要看到它的论点是什么。本文中提到,“还有一种方法确保进化意义上的自杀:存活,但少生孩子”。首先,“现在几乎没有人像过去那样多育。除了在一些宗教社区,基本没有妇女会生巧个孩子”表明了“当今出生的数量同死亡年龄一样变得平均化,我们大多数人的子女数量大致相当”。其次,人与人之间的差异和利用差异进行自然选择的机会再次减少了。再次,“印度证明了这种情况。这个国家给大城市里的少数人提供财富,而给其余的各部落居民造成了贫困。今天这种每个人的生存机会和子女数量都相同的极其显著的平均化意味着与部落相比,自然选择在印度社会中上层人群中,已经失去了80%的效力”是为了证明“人与人之间的差异和利用差异进行自然选择的机会再次减少了”,换言之,“自然选择在穷人和富人之间几乎不起作用”。答案应该是B选项。
文中提到停止进化是在第三段第一句“对我们来说,这意味着进化已经结束”。第三段中指出,“在过去的10万年―甚至过去的100年中,我们的生活发生了变化,我们的身体却没变。我们没有进化。因为机器和社会替我们办了这一切”。“机器”代表的就是 “技术”,因此我们可以判定A是正确答案。
文章中在第一段结尾提到“由于大部分差异是由基因引起的,又一个进化的因素消失了”。第二段中说“再一次,人与人之间的差异和利用差异进行自然选择的机会减少了”。第三段提到“但我们的身体却没变。我们没有进化,因为机器和社会替我们办了这一切”。这些都表明作者认为进化机制已不再起作用,认为自然进化机制已不能再左右人口的出生率。在总结全文的第三段时,作者直截了当地指出,进化已经结束。因此可以认为人类的进化是无路可走的。另外三个选项都不全面或者不对题。
文章的最后一句话是说“不管我们的子孙后代对我们离乌托邦的理想境界还差多远感到多么惊讶,他们的样子会同我们差不了多少”。这一句是和本段开始相呼应,都是谈论进化已经结束,生物学上的乌托邦已形成,并且这一过程几乎丝毫没有造成人的身体上的改变,因此是在谈论人的外貌。只有选项B正确。

第3题:

Electronic mail, or mail, as it is known to its many fans, has been around for over two decades. Typically, email systems support five basic functions, as described below.(41)refers to the process of creating messages and answers.(42)refers to moving messages from the originator to the recipient.(43)has to do with telling the originator what happened to the message. Was it rejected? Was it lost?(44)incoming message is needed. So people can read their email.(45) is the final step and concerns what the recipient does with the message after receiving it.

A.Composition

B.Transfer

C.Reporting

D.Displaying


正确答案:A

第4题:

Planning so far ahead___________no sense, because many things will have changed by nextyear.

A.made
B.is making
C.makes
D.has made

答案:C
解析:
句意为提前计划没有任何意义,明年很多事情都会改变。根据句意可知,现在提前计划没有意义,不表示动作正在进行,故选C项。

第5题:

African elephants have been slaughtered at alarming rate over the past decade, largely because they are the primary source of the world's ivory. Their population has been dwindled from 1.3 million in 1979 to just 625,000 today, and the rate of killing has been accelerating in recent years because many of the older, bigger tusked animals have already been destroyed. "The poachers now must kill times as many elephants to get the same quantity of ivory," explained Curtis Bohlen, Senior vice president of the World Wildlife Fund.
Though its record on the environment has been spotty so far, the government last week took the lead in a major conservation issue by imposing a ban on ivory imports into the US. The move came just four days after a consortium of conservation groups, including the World Wildlife Fund and Wildlife Conservation International, called for that kind of action, and it made the US the first nation to forbid imports of both raw and finished ivory. The ban, says Bohlen, sends a very clear message to the ivory poachers that the game is over.
In the past African nations have resisted an ivory ban, but increasingly they realized that the decimation of the elephant herds poses a serious threat to their tourist business. Last month Tanzania and several other African countries called for an amendment to the 102 nation Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species that would make the ivory trade illegal worldwide. The amendment is expected to be approved at an October meeting in Geneva and to go into effect next January. But between now and then, conservationists contend, poachers may go on a rampage, killing elephants wholesale, so nations should unilaterally forbid imports right away. The US government brought that argument, and by week's end the twelve nation European Community had followed with its own ban.
What's the author's attitude?

A. Subjective
B. Neutral
C. Pessimistic
D. Activ

答案:B
解析:
本题为判断态度题。文中作者只是叙述事实,并没有表示赞成或反对.是中立的态度。因此最佳选择是B。

第6题:

共用题干
第一篇

Human Evolution

Being a man has always been dangerous.There are about 105 males born for every 100 females, but this ratio drops to near balance at the age of maturity,and among 70-year-old there are twice as many women as men. But the great universal of male mortality is being changed.Now,boy babies survive almost as well as girls do. This means that,for the first time,there will be an excess of boys in those crucial years when they are searching for a mate. More important,another chance for natural selection has been removed. Fifty years ago,the chance of a baby(particularly a boy baby)surviving depended on its weight. A kilogram too light or too heavy meant almost certain death.Today it makes almost no difference.Since much of the variation is due to genes,one more agent of evolution has gone.
There is another way to commit evolutionary suicide:stay alive,but have fewer children.Few people are as fertile as in the past. Except in some religious communities,very few women have 15 children.Nowadays the number of births,like the age of death,has become average.Most of us have roughly the same number of offspring. Again,differences between people and the opportunity for natural selection to take advantage of it have diminished.India shows what is happening. The country offers wealth for a few in the great cities and poverty for the remaining tribal peoples.The grand mediocrity of today一everyone being the same in survival and number of offspring means that natural selection has lost 80%of its power in upper-middle一class India compared to the tribes.
For us,this means that evolution is over;the biological Utopia has arrived.Strangely,it has involved little physical change.No other species fills so many places in nature.But in the past 100,000 years一even the past 100 years一our lives have been transformed but our bodies have not. We did not evolve,because machines and society did it for us.Darwin had a phrase to describe those ignorant of evolution:"they look at an organic being as savage looks at a ship,as at something wholly beyond his comprehension."No doubt we will remember a 20th century way of life beyond comprehension for its ugliness. But however amazed our descendants may be at how far from Utopia we were,they will look just like us.

What does the example of India illustrate?
A:Wealthy people tend to have fewer children than poor people.
B:Natural selection hardly works among the rich and the poor.
C:The middle class population is 80%smaller than that of the tribes.
D:India is one of the countries with a very high birth rate.

答案:B
解析:
文中第一段提到“做男人从来都充满危险,新生儿男女比例大约是105: 100,但到了成年,这一比例基本持平,而在70岁的老年人中,女性是男性的两倍。但是男性死亡率高这种普遍情况正在改变,现在男婴存活率同女婴的基本一样高”,这说明男人的存活率相对是比较低的。
使用事例来证明是常见的逻辑思维模式。既然有事例,我们就需要看到它的论点是什么。本文中提到,“还有一种方法确保进化意义上的自杀:存活,但少生孩子”。首先,“现在几乎没有人像过去那样多育。除了在一些宗教社区,基本没有妇女会生巧个孩子”表明了“当今出生的数量同死亡年龄一样变得平均化,我们大多数人的子女数量大致相当”。其次,人与人之间的差异和利用差异进行自然选择的机会再次减少了。再次,“印度证明了这种情况。这个国家给大城市里的少数人提供财富,而给其余的各部落居民造成了贫困。今天这种每个人的生存机会和子女数量都相同的极其显著的平均化意味着与部落相比,自然选择在印度社会中上层人群中,已经失去了80%的效力”是为了证明“人与人之间的差异和利用差异进行自然选择的机会再次减少了”,换言之,“自然选择在穷人和富人之间几乎不起作用”。答案应该是B选项。
文中提到停止进化是在第三段第一句“对我们来说,这意味着进化已经结束”。第三段中指出,“在过去的10万年―甚至过去的100年中,我们的生活发生了变化,我们的身体却没变。我们没有进化。因为机器和社会替我们办了这一切”。“机器”代表的就是 “技术”,因此我们可以判定A是正确答案。
文章中在第一段结尾提到“由于大部分差异是由基因引起的,又一个进化的因素消失了”。第二段中说“再一次,人与人之间的差异和利用差异进行自然选择的机会减少了”。第三段提到“但我们的身体却没变。我们没有进化,因为机器和社会替我们办了这一切”。这些都表明作者认为进化机制已不再起作用,认为自然进化机制已不能再左右人口的出生率。在总结全文的第三段时,作者直截了当地指出,进化已经结束。因此可以认为人类的进化是无路可走的。另外三个选项都不全面或者不对题。
文章的最后一句话是说“不管我们的子孙后代对我们离乌托邦的理想境界还差多远感到多么惊讶,他们的样子会同我们差不了多少”。这一句是和本段开始相呼应,都是谈论进化已经结束,生物学上的乌托邦已形成,并且这一过程几乎丝毫没有造成人的身体上的改变,因此是在谈论人的外貌。只有选项B正确。

第7题:

Robert F.Kennedy once said that a country’s GDP measures“everything except that which makes life worthwhile.”With Britain voting to leave the European Union,and GDP already predicted to slow as a result,it is now a timely moment to assess what he was referring to.The question of GDP and its usefulness has annoyed policymakers for over half a century.Many argue that it is a flawed concept.It measures things that do not matter and miss things that do.By most recent measures,the UK’s GDP has been the envy of the Western World,with record low unemployment and high growth figures.If everything was going so so well,then why did over 17million people vote for Brexit,despite the warnings about what it could do to their country’s economic prospects?A recent annual study of countries and their ability to convert growth into well-being sheds some light on that question.Across the 163 countries measured,the UK is one of the poorest performers in ensuring that economic growth is translated into meaningful improvement for its citizens.Rather than just focusing on GDR over 40 different sets of criteria from health,education and civil society engagement have been measured to get a more rounded assessment of how countries are performing.While all of these countries face their own challenges,there are a number of consistent themes.Yes,there has been a budding economic recovery since the 2008 global crash,but in key indicators in areas such as health and education,major economies have continued to decline.Yet this isn't the case with all countries.Some relatively poor European countries have seen huge improvements across measures including civil society;income equality and the environment.This is a lesson that rich countries can learn:When GDP is no longer regarded as the sole measure of a country’s success,the world looks very different.So what Kennedy was referring to was that while GDP has been the most common method for measuring the economic activity of nations,as a measure,it is no longer enough.It does not include important factors such as environmental equality or education outcomes-all things that contribute to a person's sense of well-being.The sharp hit to growth predicted around the world and in the UK could lead to a decline in the everyday services we depend on for our well-being and for growth.But policymaker who refocus efforts on improving well-being rather than simply worrying about GDP figures could avoid the forecasted doom and may even see progress.
Which of the following is true about the recent annual study?

A.It excludes GDP as an indicator.
B.It is sponsored by 163 countries.
C.Its criteria are questionable.
D.Its results are enlightening.

答案:D
解析:
事实细节题。根据题目定位到第三段第一句A recent annual study of countries and their ability to convert growth into well-being sheds some light on the question,该句表明,最近年度研究调查了各国家和他们将经济增长转换为幸福感的能力,这对这个问题有所启发。说明研究的结果有利于解决经济增长与幸福感的关系。shed some light on与D选项enlightening是同义替换,因此答案为D

第8题:

请阅读Passage 1。完成第小题。
Passage 1
African elephants have been slaughtered at alarming rate over the past decade, largely because they are the primary source of the world's ivory. Their population has been dwindled from 1.3 million in 1979 to just 625,000 today, and the rate of killing has been accelerating in recent years because many of the older, bigger tusked animals have already been destroyed. "The poachers now must kill times as many elephants to get the same quantity of ivory," explained Curtis Bohlen,Senior vice president of the World Wildlife Fund.
Though its record on the environment has been spotty so far, the government last week took the lead in a major conservation issue by imposing a ban on ivory imports into the US. The move came just four days after a consortium of conservation groups, including the World Wildlife Fund and Wildlife Conservation International, called for that kind of action, and it made the US the first nation to forbid imports of both raw and finished ivory. The ban, says Bohlen, sends a very clear message to the ivory poachers that the game is over.
In the past African nations have resisted an ivory ban, but increasingly they realized that the decimation of the elephant herds poses a serious threat to their tourist business. Last month Tanzania and several other African countries called for an amendment to the 102 nation Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species that would make the ivory trade illegal worldwide.
The amendment is expected to be approved at an October meeting in Geneva and to go into effect next January. But between now and then, conservationists contend, poachers may go on a rampage,killing elephants wholesale, so nations should unilaterally forbid imports right away. The US government brought that argument, and by week's end the twelve nations European Community had followed with its own ban.

What's the author's attitude?
查看材料

A.Subjective.
B.Neutral.
C.Pessimistic.
D.Active.

答案:B
解析:
文中作者只是叙述事实,并没有表示赞成或反对,是中立的态度。故选B。

第9题:

African elephants have been slaughtered at alarming rate over the past decade, largely because they are the primary source of the world's ivory. Their population has been dwindled from 1.3 million in 1979 to just 625,000 today, and the rate of killing has been accelerating in recent years because many of the older, bigger tusked animals have already been destroyed. "The poachers now must kill times as many elephants to get the same quantity of ivory," explained Curtis Bohlen, Senior vice president of the World Wildlife Fund.
Though its record on the environment has been spotty so far, the government last week took the lead in a major conservation issue by imposing a ban on ivory imports into the US. The move came just four days after a consortium of conservation groups, including the World Wildlife Fund and Wildlife Conservation International, called for that kind of action, and it made the US the first nation to forbid imports of both raw and finished ivory. The ban, says Bohlen, sends a very clear message to the ivory poachers that the game is over.
In the past African nations have resisted an ivory ban, but increasingly they realized that the decimation of the elephant herds poses a serious threat to their tourist business. Last month Tanzania and several other African countries called for an amendment to the 102 nation Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species that would make the ivory trade illegal worldwide. The amendment is expected to be approved at an October meeting in Geneva and to go into effect next January. But between now and then, conservationists contend, poachers may go on a rampage, killing elephants wholesale, so nations should unilaterally forbid imports right away. The US government brought that argument, and by week's end the twelve nation European Community had followed with its own ban.
According to the passage, "dwindle" means______

A. decrease
B. enlarge
C. weaken
D. eliminate

答案:A
解析:
本题测试对词义的理解。根据原文可知,大象的数量在急剧减少.面表示“减少”之意的,答案A最合适。

第10题:

The discovery of the strange stone in the deserted valley has spurred series of scientific research.

A:encouraged
B:endangered
C:endorsed
D:enlarged

答案:A
解析:
本句意思:在那个荒凉的山谷中发现的奇异石头激发了一系列的科学研究。encourage的 意思为“激励,鼓励”;endanger的意思为“使……处于险境”;endorse的意思为“赞同,签名”;en- larg。的意思为“使增大”。spur的意思为“激励,促进”,和encourage的意思接近。

更多相关问题