共用题干 第二篇Are These Food Safe to Eat?Traditionally,in plant breeding,there are crossing varieties of the same species in ways they could cross naturally.For example,disease-resistant varieties of wheat have been crossed with highyield wheat to combine these

题目
共用题干
第二篇

Are These Food Safe to Eat?

Traditionally,in plant breeding,there are crossing varieties of the same species in ways they could cross naturally.For example,disease-resistant varieties of wheat have been crossed with highyield wheat to combine these properties.This type of natural gene exchange is safe and fairly predictable.
Genetic engineering(GE)makes it possible to exchange genes between unrelated species that cannot exchange genes with each other in a natural way.GE can involve the exchange of genes be-tween vastly different species一e.g. putting scorpion toxin genes into maize or fish antifreeze genes into tomatoes.It is possible that a scorpion toxin gene,even when it is in maize DNA,will still get the organism to produce scorpion toxin一but what other effects may it have in this alien environment? We have already realized this problem一adding human growth hormone genes to pigs certainly makes them grow一but it also gives them arthritis and makes them cross-eyed,which was entirely out of expectation.
It won't be difficult to find out,for example,that the gene for human intelligence will not have the same effect if it is inserted into cabbage DNA as it had in human DNA一but what side-effect would it have?In other words,is genetically modified(GM)food safe to eat?The answer is that no-body knows because long-term tests have not been carried out.
Those companies who want a GM product approved in the UK or USA are required to provide regulatory bodies with results of their own safety tests.Monsanto's soya beans were apparently fed to fish for 10 weeks before being approved.There was no requirement for independent testing,for longterm testing,for testing on humans or testing for specific dangers to children or allergic people.
The present opinion of the British Government is that"There is no evidence of long-term dangers from GM foods."In the US,the American Food and Drug Administration is now being prosecuted for covering up research that suggested possible risks from GM foods.

What is the possible attitude of the author to genetically modified agricultural products?
A:Supportive.
B:Rejective.
C:Nervous.
D:Neutral.
如果没有搜索结果或未解决您的问题,请直接 联系老师 获取答案。
相似问题和答案

第1题:

Wheat prices were generally low in the autumn, so farmers could not wait for markets to improve.(语法上正确与否)()

此题为判断题(对,错)。


答案:错

第2题:

The food we eat seems to have profound effects on our health.Although science has made enormous steps in making food more fit to eat ,it has, at the same time,made many foods unfit to eat. Some research has shown that perhaps eighty percent of all human illnesses are related to diet and forty percent of cancer is related to the diet as well,especially cancer of the colon. Different cultures are more likely to cause certain different illnesses because of the food that is characteristic in these cultures. That food is related to illness is nto a new discovery. In 1945, about 35 years ago, government researchers realized that nitrates, commonly used to preserve color in meats,and other food additives,caused cancer. Yet, these carcinogenic additives remain in our food, and it becomes more difficult all the time to know which things on the packaging labels of processed food are helpful or harmful. The additives which we eat are not all so direct. Farmers often give penicillin to beef and living animals, and because of this ,penicillin has been found in the milk of treated cow. Sometimes similar drugs are given to animals not for medical purposes,but for financial reasons. The farmers are simply trying to fatten the animals in order to obtain a higher price on the market. Although the Food and Drug Administration(FDA) has tried repeatedly to control these procedures, the practices continue.
How has science done something harmful to mankind?

a.Because of science , diseases caused by polluted food haven been virtually eliminated.
b.It has caused a lack of information concerning the value of food.
c.Because of the application of science,some potentially harmful substances have been added to food.
d.The scientists have preserved the color of meats,but not of vegetables.

答案:C
解析:

第3题:

The Grand Banks have been called the "wheat fields" of Newfoundland.()

此题为判断题(对,错)。


正确答案:√

第4题:

共用题干
第二篇

Are These Food Safe to Eat?

Traditionally,in plant breeding,there are crossing varieties of the same species in ways they could cross naturally.For example,disease-resistant varieties of wheat have been crossed with highyield wheat to combine these properties.This type of natural gene exchange is safe and fairly predictable.
Genetic engineering(GE)makes it possible to exchange genes between unrelated species that cannot exchange genes with each other in a natural way.GE can involve the exchange of genes be-tween vastly different species一e.g. putting scorpion toxin genes into maize or fish antifreeze genes into tomatoes.It is possible that a scorpion toxin gene,even when it is in maize DNA,will still get the organism to produce scorpion toxin一but what other effects may it have in this alien environment? We have already realized this problem一adding human growth hormone genes to pigs certainly makes them grow一but it also gives them arthritis and makes them cross-eyed,which was entirely out of expectation.
It won't be difficult to find out,for example,that the gene for human intelligence will not have the same effect if it is inserted into cabbage DNA as it had in human DNA一but what side-effect would it have?In other words,is genetically modified(GM)food safe to eat?The answer is that no-body knows because long-term tests have not been carried out.
Those companies who want a GM product approved in the UK or USA are required to provide regulatory bodies with results of their own safety tests.Monsanto's soya beans were apparently fed to fish for 10 weeks before being approved.There was no requirement for independent testing,for longterm testing,for testing on humans or testing for specific dangers to children or allergic people.
The present opinion of the British Government is that"There is no evidence of long-term dangers from GM foods."In the US,the American Food and Drug Administration is now being prosecuted for covering up research that suggested possible risks from GM foods.

Which statement is true based on the passages?
A:If a company can provide regulatory bodies with results of their own safety tests,it can get GM product approvals from the UK or USA.
B:The present opinion of the British Government is right.
C:Monsanto's soya beans were apparently fed to fish for 10 weeks after being approved.
D:Adding human growth hormone genes to pigs certainly makes them allergic.

答案:A
解析:
本题是细节判断题。题干是:哪种自然基因交换既安全又具有相当的可预见性?选B的依据是第一段第一句和最后一句:" Traditionally , in plant breeding , there are crossing varieties of the same species in ways they could cross naturally.""This type of natural gene exchange is safe and fairly predictable.”传统的植物培育方法,是依照植物自然杂交的方式进行相同物种的人工杂交。这种自然的基因交换既安全,又具有相当的可预见性。这说明选项B, 传统植物培育中的自然基因交换,是正确答案。
本题是细节考查题。题干是:根据原文,如下关于转基因产品的说法哪个是正确的?选C的依据是第三段第一句:"…… for example , that the gene for human intelligence will not have the same effect if it is inserted into cabbage DNA as it had in human DNA.”例如,人类的智力基因在人体DNA内和注入卷心菜DNA后的作用是不同的。所以选项C符合题目要求,是正确答案。
本题是细节推理题。题干是:根据原文能推断出如下哪个句子?选D的依据是第二段和第四段的最后一句:"… which was entirely out of expectation." " There was no requirement for independent testing,for long一term testing,for testing on humans or testing for specific dangers to children or allergic people.”而这一切是完全无法预测的。目前,尚无要求对转基因产品进行独立测试、长期测试、人体测试,或者就其对儿童或过敏者所造成的特定危险进行测试。选项D,基因工程有时有危险且难以预测,是对原文这两个事实的总结,是正确答案。
本题是细节判断题。题干是:作者可能持有的对于转基因产品的态度是什么?选B的依据是:作者在文中用来说明的事实通常和基因工程的危险和不确定性相关,所以选项B,拒绝的,是正确答案。
本题考查对于后文内容的预判能力。题干是:以下对文章的阐述哪个是正确的?选A的依据是全文第四段的第一句:" Those Companies who want a GM product approved in the UK or USA are required to provide regulatory bodies with results of their own safety tests.”在英国或者美国,如果一个公司希望其转基因产品获得批准,它必须向管理机构提供本公司转基因产品安全测试的结果。这与选项A中谈到的内容相符:如果一个公司能向管理机构提供本公司转基因产品安全测试的结果,就能从英国或美国获得转基因产品的许可。

第5题:

共用题干
What's Killing the Bats
First it was bees.Now it is bats.Biologists in America are working hard to discover the cause of the mysterious deaths of tens of thousands of bats in the northeastern part of the country.
Most of the bats affected are the common little brown bats(Myotis lucifugus,)but other species, such as the long-eared bat,the small-footed bat,the eastern pipistrelle,and the Indiana bat have also been affected. In some caves,more than 90 percent of the bat populations have died.
One possibility is disease. A white fungus(真菌)known as fusarium has been found on the noses of both living and dead bats.However,scientists don't know if the fungus is the primary cause of death,a secondary cause of death,or not a cause at all,but the result of some other conditions.
Another possible cause is a lack of food.For example,bats typically eat a large number of moths(蛾),and in some states such as New York,the number of moths has been declining in recent years. if bats can't eat enough food,they starve to death.
Still other scientists believe that global warming is to blame.Warmer temperatures in recent years have been waking up hibernating(冬眠)bats earlier than usual. If bats break their hiberna- lion at the wrong time,they might not find their expected food sources. The weather might also turn cold again and weaken or kill the bats.
Scientists might not agree on the causes of the bat die-off, but they do agree on the conse- quences. Bats are an important predator of mosquitoes:a single brown bat can eat 1,000 or more insects in an hour. They also eat beetles and other insects that damage plant crops.If there aren't enough bats,damage will be great from the insects they eat. While bats live a long time for their size-the little brown bat can live for more than 30 years-a female bat has only one baby per year,so bat populations grow slowly. Many bat species in the United States are already protected or endangered.
How can you help?Do not disturb sleeping or nesting bats.If you discover bats that seem to be sick or that are dead,contact your local Fish& Wildlife Department with the details.However, be careful not to touch the animals.

What is the purpose of the last paragraph?
A: To get people to stop killing bats
B: To hire workers for the Fish&Wildlife Department
C: To ask people not to touch dead bats
D: To tell the public how to help bats

答案:D
解析:
主旨大意题。文章前四段讲述的都是可能造成蝙蝠死亡的原因,但在第五段回归到了蝙蝠死亡导致的严重结果上——严重损害农作物。而在最后一段讲述的是如何帮助减少蝙蝠死亡。归根究底,作者是在讲述蝙蝠死亡的严


根据下文讲蝙蝠神秘的死亡可知,该句是说蜜蜂已经处于神秘死亡的过程中。


根据第一段“...such as the long-eared bat , the small-footed bat , the eastern pipistrelle , and the Indiana bat have also been affected.”可知,这里是列举一些具有各种特色或地区的蝙蝠,因此不难推测pipistrelle是“蝙蝠”的意思。故本题选D。


第三段首句讲蝙蝠死亡的一个可能原因就是缺乏食物,紧接着以纽约蛾的数量近年来一直在下降为例,说明蝙蝠缺少食物。因此蛾是蝙蝠因饥饿而死亡的一个例子。


最后一段第一句是主旨句,即你怎样帮助减少蝙蝠死亡。随后列举减少蝙蝠死亡的具体方法。故本题选D。

第6题:

We are sorry to have to complain of the quality of the wheat , but it is far ( ) the sample you sent us.

A. superior to

B. inferior to

C. prior to


参考答案:B

第7题:

共用题干
What's Killing the Bats
First it was bees.Now it is bats.Biologists in America are working hard to discover the cause of the mysterious deaths of tens of thousands of bats in the northeastern part of the country.
Most of the bats affected are the common little brown bats(Myotis lucifugus,)but other species, such as the long-eared bat,the small-footed bat,the eastern pipistrelle,and the Indiana bat have also been affected. In some caves,more than 90 percent of the bat populations have died.
One possibility is disease. A white fungus(真菌)known as fusarium has been found on the noses of both living and dead bats.However,scientists don't know if the fungus is the primary cause of death,a secondary cause of death,or not a cause at all,but the result of some other conditions.
Another possible cause is a lack of food.For example,bats typically eat a large number of moths(蛾),and in some states such as New York,the number of moths has been declining in recent years. if bats can't eat enough food,they starve to death.
Still other scientists believe that global warming is to blame.Warmer temperatures in recent years have been waking up hibernating(冬眠)bats earlier than usual. If bats break their hiberna- lion at the wrong time,they might not find their expected food sources. The weather might also turn cold again and weaken or kill the bats.
Scientists might not agree on the causes of the bat die-off, but they do agree on the conse- quences. Bats are an important predator of mosquitoes:a single brown bat can eat 1,000 or more insects in an hour. They also eat beetles and other insects that damage plant crops.If there aren't enough bats,damage will be great from the insects they eat. While bats live a long time for their size-the little brown bat can live for more than 30 years-a female bat has only one baby per year,so bat populations grow slowly. Many bat species in the United States are already protected or endangered.
How can you help?Do not disturb sleeping or nesting bats.If you discover bats that seem to be sick or that are dead,contact your local Fish& Wildlife Department with the details.However, be careful not to touch the animals.

What does the first sentence in Paragraph 1 mean?
A: Bees have been dying mysteriously.
B: The first article on the website is about bees.
C: Bees usually die before bats.
D: It was bees that caused the deaths of bats.

答案:A
解析:
主旨大意题。文章前四段讲述的都是可能造成蝙蝠死亡的原因,但在第五段回归到了蝙蝠死亡导致的严重结果上——严重损害农作物。而在最后一段讲述的是如何帮助减少蝙蝠死亡。归根究底,作者是在讲述蝙蝠死亡的严


根据下文讲蝙蝠神秘的死亡可知,该句是说蜜蜂已经处于神秘死亡的过程中。


根据第一段“...such as the long-eared bat , the small-footed bat , the eastern pipistrelle , and the Indiana bat have also been affected.”可知,这里是列举一些具有各种特色或地区的蝙蝠,因此不难推测pipistrelle是“蝙蝠”的意思。故本题选D。


第三段首句讲蝙蝠死亡的一个可能原因就是缺乏食物,紧接着以纽约蛾的数量近年来一直在下降为例,说明蝙蝠缺少食物。因此蛾是蝙蝠因饥饿而死亡的一个例子。


最后一段第一句是主旨句,即你怎样帮助减少蝙蝠死亡。随后列举减少蝙蝠死亡的具体方法。故本题选D。

第8题:

—What should a healthy diet contain? —()

A.We shouldn’t eat too much fast food because it’s rich in fat.

B.A healthy diet should contain all the essential nutrients.

C.A lot of food safety issues have been exposed in the food industry.


参考答案:B

第9题:

共用题干
第二篇

Are These Food Safe to Eat?

Traditionally,in plant breeding,there are crossing varieties of the same species in ways they could cross naturally.For example,disease-resistant varieties of wheat have been crossed with highyield wheat to combine these properties.This type of natural gene exchange is safe and fairly predictable.
Genetic engineering(GE)makes it possible to exchange genes between unrelated species that cannot exchange genes with each other in a natural way.GE can involve the exchange of genes be-tween vastly different species一e.g. putting scorpion toxin genes into maize or fish antifreeze genes into tomatoes.It is possible that a scorpion toxin gene,even when it is in maize DNA,will still get the organism to produce scorpion toxin一but what other effects may it have in this alien environment? We have already realized this problem一adding human growth hormone genes to pigs certainly makes them grow一but it also gives them arthritis and makes them cross-eyed,which was entirely out of expectation.
It won't be difficult to find out,for example,that the gene for human intelligence will not have the same effect if it is inserted into cabbage DNA as it had in human DNA一but what side-effect would it have?In other words,is genetically modified(GM)food safe to eat?The answer is that no-body knows because long-term tests have not been carried out.
Those companies who want a GM product approved in the UK or USA are required to provide regulatory bodies with results of their own safety tests.Monsanto's soya beans were apparently fed to fish for 10 weeks before being approved.There was no requirement for independent testing,for longterm testing,for testing on humans or testing for specific dangers to children or allergic people.
The present opinion of the British Government is that"There is no evidence of long-term dangers from GM foods."In the US,the American Food and Drug Administration is now being prosecuted for covering up research that suggested possible risks from GM foods.

What can we infer from the passage?
A:The British Government keeps silent when it comes to GM foods.
B:It's safe to buy GM soya beans in the supermarket.
C:The American Food and Drug Administration now set up some regulations for genetically modified plants.
D:Genetic Engineering is sometimes dangerous and rather unpredictable.

答案:D
解析:
本题是细节判断题。题干是:哪种自然基因交换既安全又具有相当的可预见性?选B的依据是第一段第一句和最后一句:" Traditionally , in plant breeding , there are crossing varieties of the same species in ways they could cross naturally.""This type of natural gene exchange is safe and fairly predictable.”传统的植物培育方法,是依照植物自然杂交的方式进行相同物种的人工杂交。这种自然的基因交换既安全,又具有相当的可预见性。这说明选项B, 传统植物培育中的自然基因交换,是正确答案。
本题是细节考查题。题干是:根据原文,如下关于转基因产品的说法哪个是正确的?选C的依据是第三段第一句:"…… for example , that the gene for human intelligence will not have the same effect if it is inserted into cabbage DNA as it had in human DNA.”例如,人类的智力基因在人体DNA内和注入卷心菜DNA后的作用是不同的。所以选项C符合题目要求,是正确答案。
本题是细节推理题。题干是:根据原文能推断出如下哪个句子?选D的依据是第二段和第四段的最后一句:"… which was entirely out of expectation." " There was no requirement for independent testing,for long一term testing,for testing on humans or testing for specific dangers to children or allergic people.”而这一切是完全无法预测的。目前,尚无要求对转基因产品进行独立测试、长期测试、人体测试,或者就其对儿童或过敏者所造成的特定危险进行测试。选项D,基因工程有时有危险且难以预测,是对原文这两个事实的总结,是正确答案。
本题是细节判断题。题干是:作者可能持有的对于转基因产品的态度是什么?选B的依据是:作者在文中用来说明的事实通常和基因工程的危险和不确定性相关,所以选项B,拒绝的,是正确答案。
本题考查对于后文内容的预判能力。题干是:以下对文章的阐述哪个是正确的?选A的依据是全文第四段的第一句:" Those Companies who want a GM product approved in the UK or USA are required to provide regulatory bodies with results of their own safety tests.”在英国或者美国,如果一个公司希望其转基因产品获得批准,它必须向管理机构提供本公司转基因产品安全测试的结果。这与选项A中谈到的内容相符:如果一个公司能向管理机构提供本公司转基因产品安全测试的结果,就能从英国或美国获得转基因产品的许可。

第10题:

共用题干
第二篇

Are These Food Safe to Eat?

Traditionally,in plant breeding,there are crossing varieties of the same species in ways they could cross naturally.For example,disease-resistant varieties of wheat have been crossed with highyield wheat to combine these properties.This type of natural gene exchange is safe and fairly predictable.
Genetic engineering(GE)makes it possible to exchange genes between unrelated species that cannot exchange genes with each other in a natural way.GE can involve the exchange of genes be-tween vastly different species一e.g. putting scorpion toxin genes into maize or fish antifreeze genes into tomatoes.It is possible that a scorpion toxin gene,even when it is in maize DNA,will still get the organism to produce scorpion toxin一but what other effects may it have in this alien environment? We have already realized this problem一adding human growth hormone genes to pigs certainly makes them grow一but it also gives them arthritis and makes them cross-eyed,which was entirely out of expectation.
It won't be difficult to find out,for example,that the gene for human intelligence will not have the same effect if it is inserted into cabbage DNA as it had in human DNA一but what side-effect would it have?In other words,is genetically modified(GM)food safe to eat?The answer is that no-body knows because long-term tests have not been carried out.
Those companies who want a GM product approved in the UK or USA are required to provide regulatory bodies with results of their own safety tests.Monsanto's soya beans were apparently fed to fish for 10 weeks before being approved.There was no requirement for independent testing,for longterm testing,for testing on humans or testing for specific dangers to children or allergic people.
The present opinion of the British Government is that"There is no evidence of long-term dangers from GM foods."In the US,the American Food and Drug Administration is now being prosecuted for covering up research that suggested possible risks from GM foods.

Which statement about GM product is true according to the passage?
A:Adding human growth hormone genes to pigs does not make them grow.
B:The American Food and Drug Administration is now doing a research that suggested possible risks from GM foods.
C:The gene for human intelligence will not have the same effect if it is inserted into cabbage DNA as it had in human DNA.
D: There has been requirement for independent testing,for long-term testing,for testing on humans or testing for specific dangers to children or allergic people.

答案:C
解析:
本题是细节判断题。题干是:哪种自然基因交换既安全又具有相当的可预见性?选B的依据是第一段第一句和最后一句:" Traditionally , in plant breeding , there are crossing varieties of the same species in ways they could cross naturally.""This type of natural gene exchange is safe and fairly predictable.”传统的植物培育方法,是依照植物自然杂交的方式进行相同物种的人工杂交。这种自然的基因交换既安全,又具有相当的可预见性。这说明选项B, 传统植物培育中的自然基因交换,是正确答案。
本题是细节考查题。题干是:根据原文,如下关于转基因产品的说法哪个是正确的?选C的依据是第三段第一句:"…… for example , that the gene for human intelligence will not have the same effect if it is inserted into cabbage DNA as it had in human DNA.”例如,人类的智力基因在人体DNA内和注入卷心菜DNA后的作用是不同的。所以选项C符合题目要求,是正确答案。
本题是细节推理题。题干是:根据原文能推断出如下哪个句子?选D的依据是第二段和第四段的最后一句:"… which was entirely out of expectation." " There was no requirement for independent testing,for long一term testing,for testing on humans or testing for specific dangers to children or allergic people.”而这一切是完全无法预测的。目前,尚无要求对转基因产品进行独立测试、长期测试、人体测试,或者就其对儿童或过敏者所造成的特定危险进行测试。选项D,基因工程有时有危险且难以预测,是对原文这两个事实的总结,是正确答案。
本题是细节判断题。题干是:作者可能持有的对于转基因产品的态度是什么?选B的依据是:作者在文中用来说明的事实通常和基因工程的危险和不确定性相关,所以选项B,拒绝的,是正确答案。
本题考查对于后文内容的预判能力。题干是:以下对文章的阐述哪个是正确的?选A的依据是全文第四段的第一句:" Those Companies who want a GM product approved in the UK or USA are required to provide regulatory bodies with results of their own safety tests.”在英国或者美国,如果一个公司希望其转基因产品获得批准,它必须向管理机构提供本公司转基因产品安全测试的结果。这与选项A中谈到的内容相符:如果一个公司能向管理机构提供本公司转基因产品安全测试的结果,就能从英国或美国获得转基因产品的许可。

更多相关问题