单选题The biggest change mentioned in the first paragraph is thatA the advertising center moved to the west states.B Madison Avenue agencies lost their leading positions in advertising.C the agencies of the industry no longer lies in the Madison Avenue.D the

题目
单选题
The biggest change mentioned in the first paragraph is that
A

the advertising center moved to the west states.

B

Madison Avenue agencies lost their leading positions in advertising.

C

the agencies of the industry no longer lies in the Madison Avenue.

D

the creatives get more and more working pressures.

参考答案和解析
正确答案: B
解析:
第一段第二句提到“…the most dramatic shift is in the center of power of the entire industry”,其中the most dramatic shift对应题干中的The biggest change。该段接下来指出“麦迪逊大街上的广告公司不再处于广告业的创新前沿”,与选项B所表达意思相符。
如果没有搜索结果或未解决您的问题,请直接 联系老师 获取答案。
相似问题和答案

第1题:

Ten amendments introduced by James Madison in 1789 were added to the Constitution. They are knows as _____.

A.the Articles of Confederation

B.the Bill of Right

C.the Civil Rights

D.Federalist Papers


正确答案:B

第2题:

The research mentioned in the last paragraph reports that

A.people with dogs did more exercise

B.dogs lost the same weight as people did

C.dogs liked exercise much more than people did

D.people without dogs found the program unhelpful


正确答案:A

第3题:

They were looking for evidence that the firms had submitted ______data price reporting agencies.

A、distorted

B、fraud

C、deliberate

D、disposed


参考答案:A

第4题:

When Washington D.C.was burned in 1814,Dollety Madison rescued many official papers from the White House.

A: stole
B:filed
C:hid
D:saved

答案:D
解析:
句意:1814年的华盛顿特区大火中,多莉?麦得森从白宫里抢救出许多官方文件。rescue意为“援救,营救”;D. save意为“抢救,挽救,拯救(常与from连用)”,与rescue意思相近;A. steal意为“偷,窃取”;B. file意为“把……归档” ;C. hide意为“隐藏”。

第5题:

For the first time on record,the number of advertising-specific jobs in the U.S.is declining in the middle of an economic expansion,according to government data.What's going on?It's certainly not a case of fewer advertisements.The typical American has gone from seeing about 500 ads each day in the 1970s to about 5,000 today,according to a common industry statistic.That is one corporate message for roughly every 10 seconds of waking life.Instead,the mysterious decline can be explained by two developments.First,there are Facebook and Google.They are the largest advertising companies in the world-and,quite likely,the largest in the history of the world.Last year,90 percent of the growth of the digital-advertising business went to just these two firms.Facebook and Google are so profitable because they use their enormous scale and data to deliver targeted advertising at a low cost.This has forced the world's large advertising firms to preserve their profitability through a series of mergers,accompanied by jobs cut.s in the name of efficiency.The emergence of an advertising duopoly has coincided with the rise of"programmatic advertising,"a term that essentially means"companies using algorithms to buy and place ads in those little boxes all over the internet."As any Macl Men fan might intuit,advertising has long been a relationship-driven business,in which multimillion-dollar contracts are hammered out over one-on-one meetings,countless lunches,and even more-countless drinks.With programmatic technology,however,companies can buy access to specific audiences across several publishing platforms at once,bypassing the work of building relationships with each one.That process produces more ads and requires fewer people-or,at least,fewer traditional advertising jobs and more technical jobs.Second,there is the merging of the advertising and entertainment businesses.As smartphone screens have edged out TV as the most important real estate for media,companies have invested more in"branded content"-corporate-sponsored media,such as an article or video,that resembles traditional entertainment more than it does traditional advertising.Some of the most prominent names in journalism,such as The New York Times,BuzzFeed,Vice,and The Atlantic,are owned by companies that have launched their own branded-content shops,which operate as stand-alone divisions.As many media companies have tried to become more like advertising companies,the value of the average"creative-account win,"an ad-industry term for a new contract,has declined,falling by about 40 percent between 2016 and 2017.So there are two major themes of the decline of advertising jobs,one that has to do with the companies that now create them and one that has to do with the way brands prefer to market themselves nowadays.In short,the future of the advertising business is being moved to technology companies managing ad networks and media companies making branded content-that is,away from the ad agencies.
Paragraphs l and 2 indicate that

A.the number of ads is experiencing an unprecedented decrease.
B.the decline of advertising jobs results from a drop in ads.
C.advertising jobs usually increase during an economic expansion.
D.Americans are more willing to read ads today than in the past.

答案:C
解析:
首段指出,美国广告业工作数量首次(For the first time on record)在经济扩张中减少(即:该现象前所未有)。第二段末句再次以“不可恩议的减少(mysterious decline)”强调现象不同寻常。可见,通常情形是“广告工作数量在经济扩张过程中会增加”,C.正确。[解题技巧]A.将首段“正经历前所未有下滑”的主体由“广告工作数量(advertising-spccific jobs)”偷换为“广告数量(ads)”。B.反向干扰:第二段①②句以问答形式指出“广告工作数量的减少并非广告数量减少造成(not a case of…)”。D.源自第二段②句,但该内容只说明“如今美国人所看广告数量显著增加”这一客观事实,并未体现“如今美国人更爱看广告”这一主观意愿。

第6题:

say something about maritime agencies and the staff related to the ship.


正确答案:There are many maritime agencies, the MSA, harbour master, the agent, stevedores company, tally agency, and so on.The MSA supervising the maritime fares, the harbour master is in charge of the harbour and inbounding and outbounding vessels, the agent is to assist the master in going through the formalities, the stevedores load and discharge the cargo, and the tally agency is responsible for the tally work during cargo handling.

第7题:

For the first time on record,the number of advertising-specific jobs in the U.S.is declining in the middle of an economic expansion,according to government data.What's going on?It's certainly not a case of fewer advertisements.The typical American has gone from seeing about 500 ads each day in the 1970s to about 5,000 today,according to a common industry statistic.That is one corporate message for roughly every 10 seconds of waking life.Instead,the mysterious decline can be explained by two developments.First,there are Facebook and Google.They are the largest advertising companies in the world-and,quite likely,the largest in the history of the world.Last year,90 percent of the growth of the digital-advertising business went to just these two firms.Facebook and Google are so profitable because they use their enormous scale and data to deliver targeted advertising at a low cost.This has forced the world's large advertising firms to preserve their profitability through a series of mergers,accompanied by jobs cut.s in the name of efficiency.The emergence of an advertising duopoly has coincided with the rise of"programmatic advertising,"a term that essentially means"companies using algorithms to buy and place ads in those little boxes all over the internet."As any Macl Men fan might intuit,advertising has long been a relationship-driven business,in which multimillion-dollar contracts are hammered out over one-on-one meetings,countless lunches,and even more-countless drinks.With programmatic technology,however,companies can buy access to specific audiences across several publishing platforms at once,bypassing the work of building relationships with each one.That process produces more ads and requires fewer people-or,at least,fewer traditional advertising jobs and more technical jobs.Second,there is the merging of the advertising and entertainment businesses.As smartphone screens have edged out TV as the most important real estate for media,companies have invested more in"branded content"-corporate-sponsored media,such as an article or video,that resembles traditional entertainment more than it does traditional advertising.Some of the most prominent names in journalism,such as The New York Times,BuzzFeed,Vice,and The Atlantic,are owned by companies that have launched their own branded-content shops,which operate as stand-alone divisions.As many media companies have tried to become more like advertising companies,the value of the average"creative-account win,"an ad-industry term for a new contract,has declined,falling by about 40 percent between 2016 and 2017.So there are two major themes of the decline of advertising jobs,one that has to do with the companies that now create them and one that has to do with the way brands prefer to market themselves nowadays.In short,the future of the advertising business is being moved to technology companies managing ad networks and media companies making branded content-that is,away from the ad agencies.
Which of the following would be the best title for the text?

A.Where Did All the Advertising Jobs Go?
B.How Do Facebook and Google Produce Ads?
C.Why is the Number of Ads Declining?
D.What is the Future of the Advertising Business?

答案:A
解析:
本文首段提出现象“广告业工作数量在减少”。随后阐释两个原因:Facebook和Google使技术工作取代广告工作;广告和媒体业务融合使媒体公司取代广告公司。末段总结指出:广告业务正在从广告公司向Facebook、Google以及媒体公司转移。可见A.为全文关注现象,为恰当题目。[解题技巧]B.错误有二:首先以偏概全,全文论述广告工作减少的两大原因,“Facebook和Google”只是其中一个原因;其次偏离文章重点:文章关注点在于“Facebook和Google对广告业工作的影响”,并非“二者如何制作广告”。C.将全文论述主体“广告工作的减少(the decline of advertising jobs)”篡改为“广告数量的减少(the number of ads is declining)”。D.源于第六段末句,但作者重在分析“广告工作的走向”,并非“广告业的未来前景”。

第8题:

The high interactive possibilities of Internet is one of the reasons for ad agencies to develop more effective online advertising strategies.()

此题为判断题(对,错)。


参考答案:对

第9题:

For the first time on record,the number of advertising-specific jobs in the U.S.is declining in the middle of an economic expansion,according to government data.What's going on?It's certainly not a case of fewer advertisements.The typical American has gone from seeing about 500 ads each day in the 1970s to about 5,000 today,according to a common industry statistic.That is one corporate message for roughly every 10 seconds of waking life.Instead,the mysterious decline can be explained by two developments.First,there are Facebook and Google.They are the largest advertising companies in the world-and,quite likely,the largest in the history of the world.Last year,90 percent of the growth of the digital-advertising business went to just these two firms.Facebook and Google are so profitable because they use their enormous scale and data to deliver targeted advertising at a low cost.This has forced the world's large advertising firms to preserve their profitability through a series of mergers,accompanied by jobs cut.s in the name of efficiency.The emergence of an advertising duopoly has coincided with the rise of"programmatic advertising,"a term that essentially means"companies using algorithms to buy and place ads in those little boxes all over the internet."As any Macl Men fan might intuit,advertising has long been a relationship-driven business,in which multimillion-dollar contracts are hammered out over one-on-one meetings,countless lunches,and even more-countless drinks.With programmatic technology,however,companies can buy access to specific audiences across several publishing platforms at once,bypassing the work of building relationships with each one.That process produces more ads and requires fewer people-or,at least,fewer traditional advertising jobs and more technical jobs.Second,there is the merging of the advertising and entertainment businesses.As smartphone screens have edged out TV as the most important real estate for media,companies have invested more in"branded content"-corporate-sponsored media,such as an article or video,that resembles traditional entertainment more than it does traditional advertising.Some of the most prominent names in journalism,such as The New York Times,BuzzFeed,Vice,and The Atlantic,are owned by companies that have launched their own branded-content shops,which operate as stand-alone divisions.As many media companies have tried to become more like advertising companies,the value of the average"creative-account win,"an ad-industry term for a new contract,has declined,falling by about 40 percent between 2016 and 2017.So there are two major themes of the decline of advertising jobs,one that has to do with the companies that now create them and one that has to do with the way brands prefer to market themselves nowadays.In short,the future of the advertising business is being moved to technology companies managing ad networks and media companies making branded content-that is,away from the ad agencies.
The underlined phrase"the companies"(Line 2,Para.6)mainly refers to

A.ad agencies.
B.media companies.
C.Facebook and Google.
D.branded content makers.

答案:C
解析:
第六段首句总结广告工作减少的两大原因,前者对应第一个原因(Facebook和Google的出现).后者对应第二个原因(广告与娱乐产业融合)。由上文可知,Facebook和Google的程序性广告使传统广告工作减少,技术性广告工作增加,即:第六段首句the companies指代Facebook and Google;create them指“生成技术性广告工作”.C.正确。[解题技巧]A.与第六段末句“广告业务正从广告代理公司转移出来,即广告代理公司无法再创造更多广告工作”相悖。B.利用文中另一重要对象meclia companies做干扰。但与之相连的是第二个原因(the way brands prefer to market themselves),即“它是品牌化内容的生产者”,并非第一个原因中the companies所指。D.实则与media companies同指(由第五段论述及第六段末句media companies making branded content可知),故同排除。

第10题:


How does codification of the laws affect governmental agents?( )

A.The law will be interpreted objectively rather than subjectively
B.Government agencies have to compromise with factual conditions
C.Occasionally,governmental agencies have to redress,correct or adapt a law for their beneft
D.Laws cannot be altered or modified but they can be incremented with new court decisions and also through jurisprudence

答案:A
解析:
推断题。根据题干关键词codification of the laws affect governmental agents可定位到第三段第二、三句The government of a large group requires an elaborate organization,the practices of which may be made more consistent and effective by codification.How codes of law affect governmental agents is the principal subject of jurisprudence,由此可知,政府需要elaborate organization(精心组织),政府的行为需要more consistent and effective(更为始终如一、有效),即政府机构工作人员必须严格按照法律规定,客观地履行自己的职责,故本题选A。参考译文:政府机关发展的过程中最重要的一点是管理行为法规的编纂,法律或法学研究通常涉及政府过去或现在的一些守则和做法。它还关注有关行为功能分析的一些问题。什么是法律?法律在政府管理中发挥什么作用?尤其是,它对管理者和政府机构成员的行为有什么影响?法律通常有两个重要特征。首先,它规范行为。它不是从表面上描述这种行为,而是就其行为对其他人的影响而言——对政府管理对象的影响。例如,当我们被告知一个人作伪证时,我们没有被告知他实际上说了什么。“抢劫”和“攻击”也不是指具体的应对方式。这些都只是强调令人厌恶的行为——在伪证中,口头答复与某些事实情况之间没有习惯性的对应关系,抢劫是对积极强化行为的消除,攻击则是对人身的伤害行为。第二,法律规定或暗示后果,通常是惩罚。因此,法律是由政府机构维持的强化措施的说明。法律在编纂前,应急措施可能成为一种控制性做法,也可能代表着通过法律生效的新做法。因此,法律既是对过去做法的描述,也是对将来类似做法的保证。法律是一种行为准则,在某种意义上,它规定了某些行为的后果,反过来又“规范”行为。法律对管理机构的影响。一大群人的政府需要一个精心组织的机构,可通过编纂法规使该机构的运行更加一致有效。法律规范如何影响政府机构是法理学的主要话题。行为过程很复杂,虽然这可能不算新颖。为了维护或“执行”出现意外情况的政府管理,一个机构必须确定一个人非法行为的事实,并且必须解释一个守则来确定惩罚,而且处罚必须执行。通常把这些部分划分为机构的特殊部门。个体“不在他人之下,而在法律之下”带来的好处通常是显而易见的,伟大的法律编纂者在文明史上享有盛誉。然而,编纂并不会改变政府行为的本质,也不会弥补其所有的缺陷。

更多相关问题